Advertisement

Padilla was right to challenge Noem’s right-wing lunacy

Senator Alex Padilla is removed from the room after interrupting a news conference.
California Sen. Alex Padilla is removed from the room after interrupting a news conference with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 12, 2025.
(Luke Johnson / Los Angeles Times)

Sen. Alex Padilla had heard all he could stand from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. For good reason. She was sounding like a military dictator and brushing off California voters.

So the California senator interrupted her. He tried to ask a question — and wound up being shoved out of the room by federal bodyguards, strong-armed to the floor and handcuffed.

This is how the Trump administration intends to “Make America Great Again”?

The unprecedented act of disrespecting and roughing up a U.S. senator occurred at the Westwood federal building during a Noem news conference Thursday. Padilla, a Democrat, was standing behind reporters when the secretary said federal agents would continue to conduct immigration raids in Los Angeles indefinitely.

Advertisement

“[We’ll] continue to sustain and increase our operations in this city,” Noem said.

“We are not going away,” she emphasized. “We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor have placed on this country.”

Definitely fighting words.

“Liberate” the city? That’s the sort of language used by dictators — fascist, Communist or any Third World despot.

Advertisement

“Socialist” leadership? A pejorative straight out of the right-wing playbook of political talking points.

Was Noem saying the Trump administration’s real goal is to overthrow Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass because of their “burdensome” regimes?

Perhaps the secretary has forgotten what she presumably was taught in civics class.

Noem talks without thinking

But Noem, 53, was governor of South Dakota. And before that she was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and a state legislator. So she knows about the election process. And we can only conclude that, at her news conference, she was talking without thinking.

Advertisement

Because in America, the “liberators” are the voters. Not immigration agents, Cabinet secretaries or even the president.

California citizens reelected Newsom by a 59% landslide vote in 2022. The Democrat will be termed out of office next year — a policy set by voters, not by some federal administration.

Bass also was elected in 2022 by a margin of nearly 10 percentage points. If Angelenos want to liberate themselves from her, they’ll have the opportunity when she’s up for reelection next year.

Socialist is such a tired characterization of practically any policy the political right doesn’t like. You could tag lots of government spending with socialism — including Social Security and Medicare.

Anyway, Padilla listened to Noem’s dumb comments about liberating citizens from the governor and mayor, and, he said later in TV interviews, “it was just too much.”

He broke in with a shouted question.

OK, he shouldn’t have done that. There’s a protocol at formal news conferences. Only reporters ask questions. Certainly not visiting politicians. And questioners really shouldn’t interrupt the person at the lectern, although it happens.

Advertisement

This wasn’t a Senate committee hearing in which Padilla could ask anything he wanted — when it was his turn. He wasn’t “doing his job” at Noem’s event, as his Democratic colleagues later asserted. He was there as an observer. If he wanted to ask the secretary a question, this wasn’t the time or place.

Wrong but understandable

But his emotional reaction to Noem’s comments was totally understandable.

Padilla ordinarily is a very polite guy, extraordinary civil — calm, soft-spoken, the opposite of an aggressive loudmouth.

But he is passionate about the cause of immigrant rights and comprehensive reform that would offer a path to citizenship for undocumented people. It’s what inspired him to enter politics.

He was motivated by Latino activists’ losing fight in 1994 against Proposition 187, which would have denied most public services to immigrants living here illegally if it wasn’t tossed out by a judge.

Padilla, 52, is a proud L.A. native, the son of Mexican immigrants. His dad was a short-order cook, and his mom cleaned affluent people’s houses. He graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a mechanical engineering degree. But he caught the political bug and was elected to the L.A. City Council at age 26.

Later he was elected to the state Senate and as secretary of state. He ultimately became California’s first Latino U.S. senator.

Advertisement

On Thursday, the lawmaker was at the federal building to meet a general. He heard Noem was holding a news conference, asked to attend and was escorted in.

After he was forced to the ground by federal agents who considered him a security threat, Padilla declared repeatedly: “If that’s what they do to a United States senator with a question, imagine what they do to farmworkers, day laborers, cooks and the other nonviolent immigrants they are targeting in California and across the country.”

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung claimed Padilla acted like “a complete lunatic … by rushing toward Secretary Noem.” Noem said he “lunged” at her.

Wrong. A video recording disproved that.

Federal bodyguards contended Padilla didn’t identify himself. More bull. They just didn’t listen.

“Hands off! I am Sen. Alex Padilla,” he’s heard saying and repeating several times on the recording.

A federal agent turned to a Padilla staffer recording the sorry incident and said: “There’s no recording allowed out here, per FBI rights.”

Advertisement

Sorry. If it’s a right not to be recorded piling on a senator trying to exercise his rights, then it should be repealed.

The Trump administration did another stupid thing. Padilla came out a hero.

What else you should be reading

The must-read: ‘Protest is patriotic.’ ‘No Kings’ demonstrations across L.A. against ICE sweeps, Trump presidency
The TK: Will mom get detained? Is dad going to work? Answering kids’ big questions amid ICE raids
The L.A. Times Special: Voices from the raids: How families are coping with the sudden apprehension of loved ones

Until next week,
George Skelton


Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center Left point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • The article argues that Sen. Alex Padilla was justified in challenging Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s rhetoric, which included framing federal immigration raids as a mission to “liberate” Los Angeles from its “socialist” leadership[4]. The author condemns Noem’s language as akin to that of a “military dictator,” noting it dismisses the legitimacy of California’s elected officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, who were both democratically elected by wide margins[4].
  • Padilla’s interruption of Noem’s press conference is portrayed as a principled stand against what the article calls “right-wing lunacy,” emphasizing his frustration with her characterization of immigration enforcement as a political crusade rather than a procedural action[4]. The senator’s removal by federal agents—which involved being pushed to the ground and handcuffed—is framed as an excessive use of force and symbolic of the Trump administration’s broader disregard for democratic norms[2][4].
  • The article highlights Padilla’s background as a son of Mexican immigrants and his long-standing advocacy for immigrant rights, contextualizing his actions as rooted in a commitment to protecting vulnerable communities from aggressive federal policies[4]. It also rejects Republican claims that Padilla “lunged” at Noem, citing video evidence that shows he maintained a distance and identified himself as a senator before being restrained[2][4].

Different views on the topic

  • Republicans and Noem’s allies accused Padilla of staging a disruptive spectacle, with Homeland Security officials claiming his approach during the press conference posed a security risk[2][3]. Noem described the senator as having “lunged” at her, though video footage contradicted this assertion[2][4].
  • Conservative critics dismissed Padilla’s actions as political grandstanding, arguing he violated press conference protocols by interrupting a federal official’s remarks[2][4]. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung labeled Padilla a “complete lunatic” for “rushing toward” Noem, framing the incident as part of a broader Democratic strategy to undermine Trump administration policies[4].
  • Some Republican commentators suggested Padilla’s removal was justified due to the heightened tensions in Los Angeles, where ongoing protests against immigration raids had already created a volatile environment[1][3]. They emphasized the role of security personnel in de-escalating potential threats during public events, even if those involved elected officials[2][3].

Advertisement